I particularly enjoy designing icons because every symbol represents more than just a shape: a function, a system state, or a small “story” that comes to life when you tap it. A good icon isn’t decorative—it’s a precise decision aid.

Why icons are so critical in the automotive context

In industrial and automotive user interfaces, icons are key navigation elements. In a vehicle, additional demands come into play: users often have to drive, observe, and decide at the same time. Symbols therefore need to be instantly understandable—language-independent and as robust as possible against misinterpretation.

The challenge: reducing complexity without losing meaning

Icon development is demanding because it has to make complex functions and processes understandable at a glance. In automotive, choosing the right visual metaphor is especially crucial: drivers often make decisions in milliseconds. Icons must therefore be not only aesthetically consistent, but above all unambiguous, testable, and systematic.

Requirements for automotive system icons

• Clarity & fast recognition (including in peripheral vision)

• System consistency (style, stroke weight, perspective, metaphor logic)

• Ergonomics & cognitive load (minimal distraction, clear prioritisation)

• Scalability (from instrument cluster to infotainment, different sizes/displays)

• Safety logic (warning levels, state changes, error tolerance)
  

Practical relevance

Using typical system and function icons, it becomes clear how visual decisions can improve usability and safety—through strong metaphors, consistent rules, and a design that reliably communicates technical states.

Conclusion

Automotive system icons are not a “detail”. They are a safety-relevant interface element that requires a careful balance of aesthetics, functionality, and clarity. Well-designed icons reduce cognitive load, support fast decisions, and directly contribute to a better user experience and greater safety.